Scope
Foreword written by Jean-Marc Franssen in the proceedings of the First Workshop Structures in Fire 2000 held in
Copenhagen:
Why this workshop?
Looking back some 10 or 20 years ago,
the scientific community dealing with the problem of fire in buildings
could, schematically, be divided into two separate groups; one group
was dealing with the fire side of the problem and was considering that
the temperature of 540°C was anything which had to be known
concerning the structure of the building; the other group was
investigating the behaviour of the structure, quite happy with the
comfortable feeling that the ISO curve was a perfect representation of
the fire.
The disadvantages of this situation
with very little, if any, communication between the two groups
progressively became more and more evident and people started to
consider talking to each other and, even more, to widen their field of
investigation and have a look into the other guy’s garden. Other
aspects also came into consideration such the behaviour of human
beings, risk analysis, etc. This evolution lead to the now widely
accepted concept of Fire Safety Engineering which, simply saying, is
nothing more than the fact that we are starting to treat the problem of
Fire Safety in the way that engineers treat other problems, i.e. trying
to do their best in order to take into consideration every phenomenon
which is suspected to play a role.
There was anyway a positive aspect to
the situation prevailing in these old days: it was very easy and common
to meet and discuss with the few people who had a real expertise in
your field of application. Specialised meetings were regularly
organised in which all the experts who counted would normally show up.
For the structural analysis, some examples are:
-the ECCS Workshop on material
properties at elevated temperatures, by ECCS committee 3 - Fire safety
of steel structures, in Arnhem, The Netherlands, in Jure 1986,
-the EGOLF seminar “Protection
contre l‘incendie des structures en acier. Harmonisation
Européenne", in Brussels, Belgium, in November 1986,
-the Abschlusskolloquium "Bauwerke
unter Brandeinwerlcung", Technische Universitat Bratmschweig, in
Bratmschweig, Germany, in April 1987,
-the Eurocodes, Structural Fire
Design, Seminar organised by the Eurocode fire drafting goups, in
Luxembourg, in June 1990,
-the 3rd CIB/W 14 Fire Safety
Engineering Workshop on Modelling, in Rijswijk, The Nederlands, in
January 1993,
-or, to some extend, the First
European Symposium on Fire Safety Science, IAFSS, in Zurich,
Switzerland, in August 1995.
The field of interest was certainly
too narrow, but the progress were spectacular. Nowadays, the same
specialists and their presentations tend to be disseminated in
different places and various meetings: for the organiser of every
structural conference on steel, on concrete or on wood, this looks much
smarter if he has a session on such an exotic topic as fire, and a
couple of papers are indeed published in these general conferences but
the interest of the public is generally poor, and very few of those who
would really be interested are present. The same problem holds for the
publications that, as academic, many researchers have to present in
some journals which are prestigious but have only a marginal interest
for fire.
Concerning the big conferences
specifically dedicated to the fire - and leaving apart that some of
them appear now to be concurrent which is another reason of
dissemination - if they are of the highest importance because they
allow to open your eyes to other aspects than those that you treat in
your everyday life, it has to be recognised that the number of
presentation is so high that very short time can be dedicated to
discussion and that it is not easy to have detailed information on a
specific topic.
At the end of 1998 and during the
year of l999, the idea was circulating that a specific association
could be created on the topic of structural fire modelling. An exchange
of e-mail messages followed and, finally, the topic was discussed in
July at an informal meeting in Poitiers during the IAFSS symposium. The
general opinion was that it would be better not to have a new
association, because there are already so many of them. In order to
promote a more intense circulation of information among those
interested by the subject, two actions were decided: one was the
creation of the SiF discussion list on internet, and the second one was
the organisation of this workshop.